Conspiracy theory vs truth and perceptions of reality. 

Conspiracy Theory vs Truth & Perceptions of Reality.

Truth. What is truth and who tells the truth? We all think we know what truth is, but what is it really? In recent years we have heard the phrase “your truth” tossed around by celebrities and as usual, it has filtered down into society where now truth can be subjective. Subjective truth is truth based off of a person’s perspective, feelings, or opinions. Everything we know is based on our input – our senses, our perception. Thus, everything we know is subjective. So in a sense, all truths are subjective. When we look at events in our lives at whatever level, we look at the truth we know to be valid as indisputable fact based on our interpretation of events. We have all heard variations of the saying there are two sides to every story like his side and her side. My favorite is the three sided variant, his side, her side and the truth is in the middle. 

However in reality, truth is not based on perception or senses, truth is based on the way things are in actuality. The definition of truth is:

Lets focus specifically on number 3, verified or indisputable fact… When we think of truth, this is what most people consider to be the accurate definition. For the purposes of this article, I will be using this as the basis for discussing truth. 

Diving even deeper, let’s define fact. 

With these definitions in mind, do we view events in our world based on fact? I believe we all do, but who gives us the facts? 

I have a good friend who uses the example of three people in a room, person 1 speaks one language, person 2 speaks another and person 3 speaks both. Who has the power in the confines of that relationship? Obviously person 3. Person 1 and person 2 must have trust that person 3 is relaying a factual interpretation of the words spoken. But if person 3 does not translate accurately, yet person 1 and 2 believe he has, are person 1 and 2 held accountable for being misled? Is what they believe fact?

Who are the main interpreters in our world? I would argue there are four, in general terms, government, media, academia and ecclesiastical. Regardless of who we are or where we are in the world, we derive our historical, spiritual or cultural views and perceptions of world events based on information provided to us by these four entities. We trust they give us truthful information, so that we may make informed decisions and they shape our beliefs on issues which are deeply personal. The key word used when discussing truth in this context is trust. We trust the sources providing us information, so basically truth is not based on facts, truth is based on what we believe to be fact. Whether the source is a newspaper, a textbook, the television or a person delivering the message.

All actual truth passes through three stages. The first stage is denial, the second stage is violent opposition and the third is acceptance as common knowledge. Whoever you are reading this article, you fall into one of those three stages. This applies to every aspect of our lives… what one person believes as common knowledge, others deny or attack and vice versa. However there is only one truth. What we believe to be true may not be true, it is just our belief that it’s true based on life experience or information intake. 

In society and nature, we have laws that govern us. In society, we have a government that enacts laws which may or may be negotiable, depending on each respective government. However, in nature, we have physical laws which are not subject to negotiation, such as the laws of gravity, motion, and supply and demand. 

In our society, anyone who questions what is delivered as truth by supposed trusted sources, by and large is considered to be engaging in conspiracy theory.

What is a conspiracy theory? Let’s go back to the dictionary and define both terms: 

However, when you put these words together back to back, you get a completely different definition:

Why do these words in combination drastically diverge from the individual meanings? The difference is not insignificant, and in fact is quite staggering. 

Many believe the term conspiracy theory was cultivated by the CIA as a derogatory term used to define those who questioned the assassination of John F Kennedy. In truth, the term goes back much farther, but I have no doubt it was re-branded by the CIA for the very purpose of a derogatory label. 

Why is it such a taboo in our modern world to question things? When logic does not match reality, it causes suspicion, and rightfully so.  At our core, the spirit of the American people has always been rebellious in the sense we have not wanted to be told what to do or how to think. Our yearning for freedom is stronger here than anywhere in the world. When did that yearning to question authority wane? Since the end of World War II, I would argue the American spirit, while still maintaining the appearance of rebelliousness, for the most part has lost that true sense of questioning authority… but NOT because we don’t question authority. Yes, we still question things but the basis we use to question has been deliberately twisted. Our perception of reality and what we believe to be true based on the trust we have given to the handlers of information has failed us. 

Consider this, in a February 1981 meeting of the newly elected Reagan administration with cabinet members, Reagan asked all his cabinet members what they saw as the goal of their for the respective agency or department they oversaw, here is an excerpt of CIA Director William Casey’s remarks to Reagan; “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” That is quite a statement! When you add in the verifiable fact, the CIA, under the code name Mockingbird, infiltrated media going back to the 1950’s and there have been other documents declassified by CIA which detail the close relationship between the CIA and mainstream media and academia, this statement by Casey should cause serious alarm. 

(6 minute video)

“The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist.” is an old phrase from 1836 originally attributed to John Wilkinson which was popularized by the fictional character Keyser Söze the 1995 movie “The Usual Suspects.” It’s very apropos for modern society… All we need to do is substitute the devil with the CIA. Clearly the CIA exists, but if we take into consideration the relationship the CIA has with the media and examine facts presented by the media and overlay them with laws that cannot be negotiated or we use logic as a baseline, there are events in recent history which are not truly able to stand up to scrutiny. The problem is, we have credible people in all aspects of our lives who we trust that have convinced us that black is white. 

I would say virtually everyone has this underlying suspicion that something is just not right or that the facts don’t add up, so why do we not question? 

We don’t question things because we have been conditioned NOT to step out of line by society. Society, whether by peer pressure or fear of ridicule or fear of going against the grain, puts an enormous amount of pressure on anyone who goes against what is accepted as fact by society, regardless of its veracity. It reminds me of the crab in the bucket mentality, if you start to climb out of the bucket (speaking truth), the other crabs will do what they can to pull you back in (using ridicule/slander), so stay inside the bucket with them. 

It takes a great amount of courage to stand up for truth even if what is true is not what is accepted as true by the world at large because society is a powerful enemy. Society does not examine facts, society does not use logic, society relies on systemic belief otherwise known as herd mentality. Herd mentality is the inclination for individuals within a group to follow along with what the group at large thinks or does. This is where the second stage of truth comes into view, violent opposition. When anyone deviates from this, they are attacked or bullied, usually with derogatory terms which include but are not limited to; conspiracy theorist, twoofer, tin foil hat, extremist, ultra right wing, fringe, lunatic, paranoid or delusional. Everything thrown at the individual or group who questions what is commonly accepted is done with the express purpose of discrediting the messenger rather than listening to the message. Yet another form is the strawman argument, where the attacker argues that a person holds a view that is not what the person believes, but is actually a distorted version of what he/she believes, so instead of attacking the actual belief statement or belief, the distorted view is attacked. When we are able to rise above the fear of ridicule and examine evidence for ourselves, using logic, discernment and intellect free from preconceived bias, we will only then be able change the hearts and minds by changing the paradigm of society. 

Paradigm shift…

First, what is a paradigm?

If the paradigm of society as a whole is skewed in a particular direction or towards a belief whether true or not, it is very difficult to penetrate that commonly held belief. What is needed is a societal paradigm shift. 

This is an example of a paradigm shift.

The following is a passage/video from “Seven Habits of Highly Effective People” by Steven Covey about a paradigm shift. 

(4 minute video)

“I remember a mini-paradigm shift I experienced one Sunday morning on a subway in New York. People were sitting quietly – some reading newspapers, some lost in thought, some resting with their eyes closed. It was a calm, peaceful scene.

Then suddenly, a man and his children entered the subway car. The children were so loud and rambunctious that instantly the whole climate changed.

The man sat down next to me and closed his eyes, apparently oblivious to the situation. The children were yelling back and forth, throwing things, even grabbing people’s papers. It was very disturbing. And yet, the man sitting next to me did nothing.

It was difficult not to feel irritated. I could not believe that he could be so insensitive as to let his children run wild like that and do nothing about it, taking no responsibility at all. It was easy to see that everyone else on the subway felt irritated, too. So finally, with what I felt like was unusual patience and restraint, I turned to him and said, “Sir, your children are really disturbing a lot of people. I wonder if you couldn’t control them a little more?”

The man lifted his gaze as if to come to a consciousness of the situation for the first time and said softly, “Oh, you’re right. I guess I should do something about it. We just came from the hospital where their mother died about an hour ago. I don’t know what to think or do, and I guess they don’t know how to handle it either.”

Can you imagine what I felt at that moment? My paradigm shifted. Suddenly I saw things differently, and because I saw differently, I thought differently, I felt differently, I behaved differently. My irritation vanished. I didn’t have to worry about controlling my attitude or my behavior; my heart was filled with the man’s pain. Feelings of sympathy and compassion flowed freely. “Your wife just died? Oh I’m so sorry! Can you tell me about it? What can I do to help?” Everything changed in an instant.” 

That is a powerful short story about the power of how we think something is one way, when it may not be what we think. In that example, society almost demanded the rider do something about the man and his children… when he did, he discovered reality was not what it appeared to be.  He had a paradigm shift.

I am sure you can easily see how this principle can be applied to issues in the world labeled as conspiracy theory. Its all about our paradigm… what we believe to be true, may in fact, not be true.

In talking about conspiracy theories, I love to use the example of the raffle. It’s yet another powerful metaphor. It goes like this… In theory, if I purchase a raffle ticket I could win a prize and as long as I don’t purchase a raffle ticket the win is nothing but theoretical. BUT!! The second I purchase a raffle ticket, the win no longer becomes theoretical, it now is in the realm of possibility. Not probable but certainly possible. If I purchase more raffle tickets though, my chances of winning increase and the more tickets I purchase, the more likely and in fact probable my chances of winning become. Conspiracy theories are similar. If there is no evidence to support a theory, it is exactly that, a theory. BUT!! If there is a piece of evidence, regardless of how flimsy or circumstantial it is, the theory enters the realm of possibility. The more evidence you have, the more possible and eventually probable that theory becomes. 

A primary issue with looking at evidence, is the evidence provided by the sources of information we are supposed to trust generally falls under the category of  being socially believed regardless of its validity. The societal consensus is the media would never deliberately lie to perpetuate an even greater lie. I believe this is grossly naive. Consider this passage from Jim Marrs book Rule By Secrecy:

According to conspiracy researchers Jonathan Vankin and John Whalen the American public’s attitudes are shaped by a sanitized “Disney” view of both history and current events. “The ‘Disney version’ of history could just as easily be called the ‘New York Times version’ or the ‘TV news version’ or the ‘college textbook version,'” they wrote. “The main resistance to conspiracy theories comes not from people on the street but from the media, academia, and government—people who manage the national and global economy of information.”

Anthony C. Sutton, a London-born economics professor who was a research fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover institution, agreed that an “Establishment history” dominates textbooks, publishing, the media, and library shelves. “During the past one hundred years any theory of history or historical evidence that falls outside a pattern established by the American Historical Association and the major foundations with their grant making power has been attacked or rejected—not on the basis of any evidence presented, but on the basis of the acceptability of the arguments to the so-called Eastern Liberal Establishment, and its official historical line,” he commented. “Woe betide any book or author that falls outside the official guidelines. Foundation support is not there. Publishers get cold feet. Distribution is hit and miss, or non-existent.”

 This refrain was echoed by President Bill Clinton’s academic mentor, Dr. Carroll Quigley. His 1966 book, Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, revealed his insider knowledge of modern secret societies. Quigley said it was withdrawn suddenly by a major New York publisher. “I am now quite sure that Tragedy and Hope was suppressed . . . ,” Quigley wrote in the mid-1970s.

Unfortunately, what is required to separate the false information from the valid information is discernment, which requires critical thinking… something our society lacks in a severe way. I find today that most people do not think. Everyone believes they know what truth is, but I fear they rely more upon bias, than actual facts and data. Or they hear someone they trust give their opinion or argument on an issue or know someone who has a strong opinion one way or the other, then the individual (without doing his/her own research) passes their trusted sources argument off as their own. It’s laziness and intellectually dishonest, but they fear not sounding knowledgeable and don’t give it a second thought. Moreover, if they are questioned, they resort to name calling to preserve their own sense of self worth. 

To illustrate my point about the lack of thought, there was an educational study conducted where the subjects were given a new concept that went against something they already believed and asked to believe it (for example the 9/11 was an inside job, this is not the example, I am offering this AS an example). 

  • 50% believed it immediately — without thinking.
  • 30% didn’t believe it, immediately — without thinking.
  • 15% wanted to wait awhile while they made up their minds, but asked for no clarification and no further information.
  • 5% analyzed all the details and finally came to a conclusion.

The results of the study went like this, It is estimated that 5% of the people think, 15% of the people think they think, and 80% of the people refuse to think.

In conclusion, as the Q phenomenon is gaining strength, we are approaching a critical mass in terms of changing the tide of beliefs in our society. It has been scientifically established that only 10% of the population is required to change what is accepted by society as a whole. According to a Pew Research poll of U.S. adults released in March of this year, 3% of those polled claimed to know a lot about Q, 20% knew a little 76% knew nothing and 2% did not respond. Keep in mind, only 3% of the population took up arms against the British during the revolution, so 3% is not an insignificant number. The United States has 330 M people, 3% is just over a million people.

It does not matter if you are a conservative or a liberal, a Democrat or a Republican or an Independent or a pink unicorn. Truth is truth, and we should all do our own research, free from bias. Even if we agree with whoever has political power now or those on the television are confirming our bias as we refuse to exit the comfort of our echo chamber, we owe it to ourselves to step out and do our own research and discover truth using logic, reasoning and discernment without influence of ideology or bias. Not to sound hyperbolic, but humanity’s existence relies upon it.

 

A year of being deplatformed: Reflections on digital assassination

Martin Geddes March 9, 2020

“Do not call conspiracy everything this people calls a conspiracy;

do not fear what they fear, and do not dread it.”

— Isaiah 8:12

“It’s going to be BIBLICAL.”

— Q

It was a year ago today that I received an email from Medium saying that they were suspending my account, as I had broken their policy on “Controversial, Suspect, and Extreme Content”. I wrote two articles at the time (here and here) documenting the experience, and would like to offer you some additional thoughts on this first anniversary.

Back in 2016 I attended the Hyperwellbeing conference in Mountain View, CA. Mark Rolston of Frog Design made a comment that stuck in my mind: our virtual identities and physical identity are becoming melded, and are increasingly hard to separate. This theme has been echoed by former Marine and CIA officer Robert David Steele, who calls deplatforming “digital assassination”.

When an online identity is deplatformed, YOU are personally under attack. As far as others are concerned, who see you only via your avatars, deplatforming is akin to death. You no longer exist, and you have had a part of your identity taken away from you — involuntarily and violently. Deplatforming is a bit like having your phone number AND address book seized because you said something the cellular network operator didn’t like.

This has an impact in the real world.

I was targeted not because I was writing about crazy “conspiracy theories”, but because my writing on #QAnon was too close to the truth. A criminal mafia has been in charge of Silicon Valley and the mass media, and the evidence is overwhelming of Q being a military intelligence program to expose them. Warplanes going around with callsigns of “Q” and “anon” mean it’s not a political stunt; Dan Scavino just tweeted a favourite Qism, showing it is at the heart of power; and the media consistently refuses to #AskTheQ.

This demonstrates the mass media is coordinated crimimal propaganda (think: Russiagate hoax), and not legitimate journalism. It is not hard to figure out the media is run by crooks, if only you pay attention to independent sources. Silicon Valley’s social media giants are just #FakeNews with extra algorithms. The evidence is already public for those with eyes to see and ears to hear.

We are now watching the biggest anti-mob takedown in history. Just as people were laughed at for calling out the Italian Mafia, the Deep State — aka Khazarian Mafia — results in ridicule, prior to remorse and repentance. I was in the crosshairs of the Deep State for being ahead of the game, and my presumption is that I was deplatformed because I was causing [them] real damage.

The article that had “gone viral” — #WWG1WGA: The Greatest Communications Event in History — had reached over 1/4 million hits on Medium. I recently received this email (lightly edited here for readability) which gives you a sense of the impact I was having:

Subject: Your initial Q article

Message: You wrote an article that, in my opinion, was the best written to date — giving the analysis that brought you to the conclusion that Q was real. I had it in my iPhone Safari queue and I shared it often with those who did not know about Q, or did not consider it real. Many friends were “red pilled” by that article.

One day I went to share it and it was gone. I only recently found out you were deplatformed. I have spent hours looking for it on the web because I found it so effective to share. Is there any way to link to that article now, or is it gone for good?

This deplatforming will have had its intended effect of slowing down the spread of knowledge about Q. The impact of deplatforming on me personally is also significant.

Firstly, it was social. I discovered that I essentially had zero real friends in my tech liberal professional circles. None at all. Every single one was a hypocrite, and nobody reached out to say they were against this deplatforming action. This was a shock at the time, but in retrospect is unsurprising.

There was no due process from Medium. I was not told which content was infringing, nor was I given a chance to change it. Many people know me well from my days as a telecoms consultant and Internet commentator. They know I am not stupid, careless, or extremist. There are quite a few who should hang their head in shame should they ever claim to be defenders of free speech in future. You failed the test when it mattered.

Secondly, there was a financial impact. Those 100+ articles had my Patreon and PayPal links at the bottom, and those are essentially all my income. This has been a rough journey in the last two years, and I have been constantly “at the edge” money-wise. It wasn’t just my thoughts and name that were taken down, it was also an important source of safety — and new patrons and subscribers. This put an extra load on me, including on my health.

It also made me nervous to invest in my nascent photography business, since the same criminal gang could target me over and over, kicking me off Twitter, PayPal, Patreon, and Mailchimp. These are not hypothetical concerns; others have been booted off for writing about “controversial” crime and corruption matters. I am now ready to launch my new art career, but only because a generous Patriot stepped up to take the commercial risk away from me.

Thirdly, there was an emotional and psychological impact. Many of the people running the major tech companies and mass media are gangsters. There is a reason for the ongoing mass resignations of CEOs of major corporations. This corruption purge is very real. Being singled out by the Silicon Mafia is inevitably worrying. I have had to think harder about my personal safety and operational security.

When I had my kidney infection meltdown, a friend commented that my paranoid fears of me and my family being targeted were all too credible, and thus initially hard to dismiss as being caused by illness. I don’t normally worry about my welfare, as it is a reasonable guess that anyone who has stuck their neck out as far as I have is closely monitored and protected. But it wasn’t so obvious a year ago, since I was among the first to be publicly punished for prescience.

The problem of mass censorship — and indifference to it from the “liberal” (i.e. technofascist) elite — is very much alive and ongoing. You can easily lose your acting career for stating you approve of Donald Trump, and the courts are putting out censor-friendly verdicts. The overall pattern is obvious, and personal anecdotes of censorship are easy to find.

I have invested a huge number of hours and creative energy into my online presence. The power to deplatform isn’t just about censorship. My Twitter account, and the ability to market my art, is important to my ability to house myself and feed my family. I made more selling Christmas calendars than I ever have from writing, but sustaining that requires access to my market. To have your livelihood removed capriciously and with no redress is simply wrong and unacceptable.

I have learned to adapt and limit my risk. I have many backup accounts in case Twitter goes down. I export my mailing lists regularly in case Mailchimp “does a Medium” on me. I host my own critical content (at more cost I can barely afford). I have also learned that this really is a war, and I am entitled to ask for help and should graciously receive it. The burden is not mine alone to carry. My “social security” is all the people I am connected to online, and who care about my welfare.

Whilst social media companies have the right to set rules and obligation to police abuse, they should not have the power to own our identities or restrict our freedom of association. We have to recognise that an identity like “@martingeddes” is ethically part of ME, and that my social graph belongs to US. Deplatforming without due process must end. We need something akin to telephone number portability, but for social graphs, so nobody is completely dependent on any one social network.

May this be the last anniversary on which I have to lament this phenomenon, and its impact on myself and others. If whoever at Medium made the decision to deplatform me did so under duress, then I forgive you unconditionally. If you exercised free will to take me offline, then I hope there is a RICO sealed indictment waiting for for you. You have thoroughly earned the consequences.

Nothing can stop what is coming.

Nothing.

The Silent War and Digital Soldiers By Martin Geddes

By Martin Geddes March 1, 2020

Original link to Martin Geddes website is broken

“Men are so simple and so much inclined to obey immediate needs that a deceiver will never lack victims for his deceptions.”
— Niccolo Machiavelli
One of the most powerful things one can do is to name a previously unnamed phenomenon. The conflict was are currently immersed in seems to be picking up the moniker The Silent War.

Its occulted nature is that Silent War happens in the shadows, under the ground, in secret, in the skies, and beyond perception. Just as the Cold War was “like industrialised war, but visibly fought everywhere between nations”, this Silent War is “like ye olde war, but invisibly fought everywhere and by everyone”.

To make sense of what seems to be going on, I have some data points that may be of help to you. In How we stay blind to the story of power the British investigative journalist Jonathan Cook writes (with my emphasis):

Very obviously power’s main concern is the ability to conceal itself. Its exposure as power weakens it, by definition. Once exposed, power faces questions about its legitimacy, its methods, its purposes. Power does not want to be seen, it does not want to be confined, it does not want to be held accountable. It wants absolute freedom to reproduce itself, and ideally to amass more power.

Here he hints at the potential for (unaccountable) “dark power” to create systems to reproduce itself as a kind of parasite on the (accountable) “light power” of civil society. Where might this take us? He continues…

That is why true power makes itself as invisible and as inscrutable as it can. Like a mushroom, power can grow only in darkness. That is why it is the hardest thing to write about in ways that are intelligible to those under its spell, which is most of us, most of the time. Because power coopts language, words are inadequate to the task of describing the story of real power.

Note that this is from someone who identifies with the political left. Power that comes from secrecy and deceit is on a good-evil axis, not left-right. Invisible dark power entraps people, usurps their free will, and appropriates their resources — so as to fuel its evil ends. These in turn are presented as being meritorious and virtuous to its victims!

Carrying this theme further, in The Origins of the Deep State in North America, Canadian journalist Matthew Ehret writes (again my emphasis):

If a society can be kept under the control of their belief in what their senses tell them, then the invisible structures governing their behaviour will remain mystical and unknowable. More importantly than that, those intentions shaping such structures towards a pre-determined goal will also remain unknowable. If unknowable, then beyond the reach of judgement, and if beyond the reach of judgement, then unchangeable.

This suggests that such “dark power” might be sustained over very long periods, and with specific goals in mind. How long? Well…

This has been the great secret of empire since the days of the Babylonian priesthood and Babylon’s whore Rome, since whose collapse, three more incarnations have manifested themselves in the forms of the Byzantine, Venice and Anglo-Dutch empires. This is the dynamic at the heart of what has today come to be known as “the Deep State”.

There is a simplistic view of society that “dark power” is confined to small-scale “conspiracies”, and that these cannot coalesce and become a cancer of criminal culture. Exposure would be too easy: one whistleblower, and the media would pick up on it. The existence of totalitarian societies shows this to be false: dark power can grow to displace the light, via violence, subversion, and deception.

In the case of the modern West, what if the mass media was itself corrupt to the core, and little more than a mouthpiece for Globalist gangster government? What if an alliance of secret societies, intelligence agencies, bloodline families, corrupt officials, and usurious bankers colluded to rob the rest of the population and enslave them? What if they used extortion, blackmail, and mind control technology to achieve their ends?

The false assumption of many is that such a totalitarian “Deep State” couldn’t happen. An “incredulity barrier” stops otherwise rational people from seeing what is staring them in the face. The Western mass media has sold them endless false flag attacks, fake health scares, and fraudulent politicians. Nonetheless, the masses keep on watching the TV news, as if it were healthy and wholesome factual information.

This is captured neatly by the indomitable @StormIsUponUs:

You know why they stay asleep? Because all those cameras, clean-cut anchors, Ivy League educations, graphics, resources, highrise buildings, decades of being in my living room – it’s IMPOSSIBLE that they could be controlled by a criminal super-mafia trying to destroy the world.
The battle we are immersed in is one to awaken the masses to a very unpleasant reality. Crimes against humanity have been occurring on our watch, and without us paying attention. Millions of children are disappearing into human trafficking networks, never to be seen again. Billions of people are being poisoned by their food, environment, and medicines. Everyone is being ripped off by a banking system founded upon debt slavery, asset bubbles, and warmongering. The corporate media is just a mouthpiece of this structural elite.

So what if the “good people” organised themselves — likely over a long period — to change this tragic and longstanding state of affairs? What if there was an exigency to this process, as the cancer of corruption threatened to kill its host? What if we are right now witnessing The Silent War break through into the open?

The following anonymous post from the boards (that I have truncated) comes via @M2Madness:

The Silent War has a traditional kinetic component. For instance, there have been many seismic events that would indicate the destruction of underground military bases, for their signature is not a natural one. There is also a spiritual component, as the Satanic method is to invert right and wrong, and to encourage good people to join in movements with bad outcomes by persuading them (by deception) it is the moral thing to do.

Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, it is an information war. The mass media has been weaponised by criminals — many of whom are loyal to foreign states. This means these institutions literally are an enemy of the people. The “guns” of information warfare in the hands of citizens are computers, internet connections, and social media. This fight for narrative supremacy — between the Deep State media and the Patriot public — is now coming to a head.

Which is where “digital soldiers” come in — to borrow a term from General Flynn. We are an irregular insurgent force on a real battlefield, with physical world consequences to our fight. This very newsletter is a piece of terrain in the war: I have chosen to speak my mind and to fight. I am a strategic communications asset, too, likely monitored by the military as a consequence. Glad to be of service!

For some of us have seen the enemy’s eyes, and we will not cease our pursuit until their propaganda factory is out of action. No more will we tolerate media being a tool to protect the guilty and ruin the innocent. The days of naively allowing our family to be socially engineered via purported “entertainment” are over.

The mass media’s control over the public psyche is dependent on the true nature of “dark power” remaining concealed. Crucial to the mass media’s grand deception is that the “dots” — of wars, crimes, and crooks — do not get joined up. The public’s attention is endlessly drawn from one manufactured story to the next, without them ever being connected. There has, until now, always been a new distraction lined up ready to seize the headlines should anything awkward come to light that needs to be buried.

As digital soldiers, our battle is to connect what was not connected, to set upright that which was inverted, and to shine light on that power that was previously in the dark. We provide a true, transparent, and accountable alternative to the corrupt corporate mass media. This conflict will be won when the masses get the “big picture” of dark power — and how it has abused, robbed, and enslaved them for generations.

Expect a noisy Great Awakening to end the Silent War.

Andrew Breitbart was on the political left until he saw its corrupt reality up close.
Then he realised that THIS IS WAR

Further recommended media from my newsletter readers

By Martin Geddes Feb 29, 2020

Original link to Martin Geddes website is broken

I got a strong response to my earlier newsletter where I shared a list of alternative media sites endorsed by my Twitter followers. Many of you wrote to me say “but what about…?!?”, so I’ve collated these, and located the suitable links.

The mass media has participated in a coup attempt to cover up Spygate (and a thousand other crimes) and to take down President Trump. This is the biggest political scandal in modern history. Powerful and famous people are going to jail. LOTS OF THEM.

This is not a rehearsal: 2020 is the year when the legacy media loses its grip on the public narrative. So this list may be useful: many of people will be reconsidering their media sources… soon! As before, this list is offered without endorsement; do your own research and discernment.

Adam Riva (Dauntless Dialogue)
– “Commentary on health, politics, conspiracy, & culture”

Web: http://dauntlessdialogue.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAFHX3B6TOkppY5s0hFo9Eg

American Thinker
– “Contributors are accomplished in fields beyond journalism and animated to write for the general public out of concern for the complex and morally significant questions on the national agenda.”
Web: https://www.americanthinker.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/americanthinker

Dan Bongino (The Dan Bongino Show)
– “Former Secret Service Agent. New York Times bestselling author.”

Web: https://bongino.com/
Web: https://bonginoreport.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/DanBongino
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dbongino

Doug Belmore (Qniversity)
– “Jesus. Q. President Trump. We are the news now.”

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCS-xl89xGCgPWu7L60_2ZFw
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheQniversity

Dustin Nemos (Nemos News Network)
– “Dustin Nemos is a freedom-maximalist, Voluntaryist, Autodidact Polymath, Husband, Father, Entrepreneur, Farmer, Trend Watcher, Avid Researcher and hobbyist Economist, holistic researcher, Philosopher, And Political Talking Head.”

Web: https://www.dustinnemos.com/
Web: https://nemosnewsnetwork.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQ7VgW7XgJQjDEPnOR-Q0Qw
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DustinNemos

Gateway Pundit
– “More Accurate than The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN and MSNBC for Two Years and Counting!”

Web: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit

George Webb
– “Reporting on Political Corruption”

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrQ-wHKVi0JDWjQGcuoYnew
Twitter: https://twitter.com/GeorgWebb

Gerald Celente
– “…American trend forecaster, publisher of the Trends Journal, business consultant and author who makes predictions about the global financial markets and other important events.”

Web: https://trendsresearch.com/
Blog: https://geraldcelentesblog.blogspot.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/gcelente

Greg Hunter (USAWatchdog.com)
– “The site will keep an eye on the government, your financial interests and cut through the media spin. Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com is neither Democrat nor Republican, Liberal or Conservative.”

Web: https://usawatchdog.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/usawatchdog/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/usawatchdog

Hero’s Media Group
– “Your voice for Community Heroes, providing education, entertainment and empowerment.”

Web: https://www.heroesmediagroup.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/heroesmediagrp

James Corbett (Corbett Report)
– “…operates on the principle of open source intelligence and provides podcasts, interviews, articles and videos about breaking news and important issues from 9/11 Truth and false flag terror to the Big Brother police state, eugenics, geopolitics, the central banking fraud and more.”

Web: https://www.corbettreport.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/corbettreport

Jason Goodman (Crowdsource the Truth)
– “Crowdsource the Truth is a community sponsored news source.”

Web: https://crowdsourcethetruth.org/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8Cl9QaRtuW9CNjP7pP4BBQ
Twitter: https://twitter.com/csthetruth

Jon Rappoport (No More Fake News)
– “Jon Rappoport has worked as a free-lance investigative reporter for over 30 years. He is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX.”

Web: https://nomorefakenews.com/
Blog: https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/

Kauilapele Blog
– “This blog is intended to share some of the “things” I am “getting” from moment to moment, as energies change or move or talk to me, as well as items that may be useful to some of you as we move towards the Golden Age.”

Web: https://kauilapele.wordpress.com/

Lew Rockwell
– “The Lew Rockwell Show covers the U.S. government’s economic depredations, police state enactments, and wars of aggression.”

Web: https://www.lewrockwell.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/LewRockwellShow

Millennial Millie
– “That most elusive of creatures. A right-of-centre millennial. Non-virtue signaller. Zero snowflake credentials. Brexiter. English Identitarian. Free speech”

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCglVbeKF9JGMCt-RTUAW_TQ
Twitter: https://twitter.com/millennialmill4

Matt Couch (The DC Patriot)
– “Christian, Father of 2, Investigator, Founder The DC Patriot & America First Media Group, Razorback, Truth Slinger”

Web: https://thedcpatriot.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/RealMattCouch

Mike Thompson
– “Mike & Ck Thompson are Word-based, Spirit-filled prophets in Las Vegas, NV.  Mike oversees Word of Life- S. Las Vegas, prophetic/apostolic training center & church.”

Web: http://www.wordoflifeworldoutreach.org/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHEiuMK0UJJu5Qdnih-Z59w

One America News Network
– “…a family owned and operated, independent media company focused on providing high quality national television programming to consumers via its national cable networks.”

Web: https://www.oann.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/OANN

Northwest Liberty News
– “PICKING THE LOCK ON THE SHACKLES OF TYRANNY”

Web: https://northwestlibertynews.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/NorthWestLibertyNews
Twitter: https://twitter.com/NWLibertyNews

Tom Fitton (Judicial Watch)
– “Judicial Watch, Inc., is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.”

Web: https://www.judicialwatch.org/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/JudicialWatch
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TomFitton

Sarah Westall (Game Changer)
– “Business Game Changers with Sarah Westall – Original Content covering Innovation, Disruption, and the Big Issues”

Web: https://sarahwestall.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtO4mL7AAM97yt5EHacdpKw/videos

Starship Earth: The Big Picture
– “What’s happening on our planet—and why”

Web: http://www.starshipearththebigpicture.com/

Dr. Steve Turley
– “I believe that the secular world is at its brink, and a new conservative age is rising. Join me each week as we examine these worldwide trends, discover answers to today’s toughest challenges, and together learn to live in the present in light of even better things to come.”

Web: https://www.turleytalks.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCsiAKRKcgzA_372WbXNBaw
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalks

The Still Report
– “Bill Still is a former newspaper editor and publisher. He has written for USA Today, The Saturday Evening Post, the Los Angeles Times Syndicate, OMNI magazine, and has also produced the syndicated radio program, Health News.”

Web: https://thestillreport.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/bstill3

Techno Fog
– “Lawyer”

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog

Whatfinger News
– “The Relentless Pursuit of Creating The Greatest Aggregate Link News Site On Earth. Whatfinger News was founded by military people and 100% unapologetic for being patriotic.”

Web: https://www.whatfinger.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/WhatfingerNews

White Hats Report (True History project)
– “We are a group who have banded together to assist in the world’s awakening by reporting truth and exposing our fraudulent corporate government.”

Web: https://whitehatsreport.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCl2mXKObC3Y8QEbBOzHo_Aw

YouAreFreeTV
– “Interviews with people creating positive change for a free world based on contributionism, open-sourcing and life-loving principles for the betterment of humanity.”

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYuTOagsxlfgVBfOzCjxOPw

~~~~~~~

Final thoughts… remembering Andrew Breitbart, the Happy Warrior, a man ahead of his time.

Alternative media recommended by my Twitter followers

By Martin Geddes, Feb 25, 2020

Original link to Martin Geddes website is broken

“Just because something isn’t a lie does not mean that it isn’t deceptive. A liar knows that he is a liar, but one who speaks mere portions of truth in order to deceive is a craftsman of destruction.”
― Criss Jami

Many people are beginning to wonder if they are getting the full and truthful picture from mass media. Maybe the New York Psychopath, Criminal News Network, and The CIA Post have an agenda other than your well being? What a crazy suggestion!

Last year I asked my Twitter followers to nominate some of their favorite alternative media sources:

Imagine you are a business person learning about #TheStorm and wanting to inform yourself so you can take appropriate action. You’re not interested in its history or esoterica. Which are the sober sources and serious publications that you should consider?

With a bit of assistance, below is their edited response. This is offered without endorsement or recommendation, and makes no claim to completeness or correctness.

The order is alphabetical. I have added a few words of their own contextual information. Treat it as a starting point for a more diverse and healthy media diet. When you’ve been fed only propaganda, it may be sickening to hear truth at first.

If this list seems to lean to towards the political right, that’s because too many on the left refuse to question what a lawless and lying mass media tells them. Reality isn’t “left” or “right”, and isn’t going to change for your personal comfort. Will you change your media choices to better align to reality?
Abel Danger
– “With Field McConnell” (who has been in the news a lot!)
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUJUFyNwMpX4E2PWC2uBtQA

Amazing Polly
– “I enjoy discussing morality, truth, integrity & how to keep sane, strong and whole while swimming in a soup of gaslighting & lies, smear campaigns & psychological warfare.”
Twitter: https://twitter.com/99freemind
YouTube: youtube.com/c/AmazingPolly

And We Know (featuring Serialbrain2)
– “Bringing positive news in the midst of darkness.”
Web: https://www.andweknow.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzFSNq-Q7QV6kBSw9zCoVXg

Black Conservative Patriot
– “This is the Red Pill channel with a conservative/quasi-libertarian point of view. We deal in reality and truth in the world of news, politics, economics, President Trump to the Constitution.”
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdVSlmNi1uyfsgOAT_TbVyg
Twitter: https://twitter.com/black_c_patriot

Breitbart
– “News, commentary, and destruction of the political/media establishment.”
Web: https://www.breitbart.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews

Brendan Dilley
– “Host of the Pro America And Pro Trump… DILLEY SHOW!”
Twitter: https://twitter.com/DilleyShow
Periscope: http://pscp.tv/therealhublife

Citizen Free Press
– “Gives us stories that Drudge won’t”
Web: https://www.citizenfreepress.com/category/breaking/

The Conservative Treehouse
– “Conservative News Clearing House”
Web: http://conservativeangle.com/

Corey’s Digs
– “Investigative Journalist”
Web: https://www.coreysdigs.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/CoreysDigs
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbdo4fY3kJTLllYguw9ELZA

Daniel Lee
– “Follower of Yahshua the Messiah, obedient to Torah.”
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dnajlion7
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQ1h0i1ksKlvPI7zI6t9XoA

Dr. Dave Janda
– “Clinical researcher, health care policy analyst, author (The Awakening of a Surgeon), Talk show host (Operation Freedom)”
Web: https://davejanda.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/docdhj
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJ-qLG1bdWVrHM-Hu2W73CQ

Epoch Times
– “An independent, award-winning voice in print & online. Integrity & truthfulness in reporting.”
Web: https://www.theepochtimes.com/
Email: http://ept.ms/–Newsletters
Twitter: https://twitter.com/epochtimes

Epoch Times writer Brian Cates
– “Brian Cates is a writer based in South Texas and author of ‘Nobody Asked For My Opinion … But Here It Is Anyway!’”
Twitter: https://twitter.com/drawandstrike

GEORGE
– “Not Just Politics as Usual”
Web: https://georgenews.org/#/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/thecollectiveq

In Pursuit of Truth
– “…we will continue to make compelling media (podcasts, interviews, documentaries) with the aim of bringing us all one step closer to the truth!”
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAyrKoW31y5UcsRjh2ItvxQ/videos
Twitter: https://twitter.com/IPOT1776

intheMatrixxx
– “Proud Father Patriot funded researcher and sleuth.”
Web: https://inthematrixxx.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/intheMatrixxx
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtYWoR-C-oAceQse9Wam_fQ

Joe M
– “Creator of the series: Q – The Plan To Save The World. Because humans do not naturally exist in a state of conflict… it’s always been [THEM].”
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDFe_yKnRf4XM7W_sWbcxtw
Twitter: https://twitter.com/StormIsUponUs

Jordan Sather
– “Jordan Sather is a nationally renowned educator, filmmaker, YouTube influencer, speaker, and inspiration to thousands of people wanting to become stronger, more conscious versions of themselves.”
Web: https://www.jordansather.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/jordan_sather_
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMVTRzCXvIbdK0Y1ZxD-BlA/videos

Kevin Shipp
– “Former CIA Counter Terrorism, Counterintelligence and Staff Investigator. Author, From the Company of Shadows – CIA operations/use of secrecy.”
Web: https://www.fortheloveoffreedom.net/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Kevin_Shipp
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAGBT7-06gECLJus3o2SE3w/videos

Lionel Nation
– “Emmy® totin’ #Paronomasiac #TrialLawyer #Patriot #TruthSentry”
Web: https://lionelmedia.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/LionelY2K
Twitter: https://twitter.com/LionelMedia

Mark Taylor
– “Ret Lieutenant Firefighter/Christian/Author -The Trump Prophecies/ Conservative/Warrior of the most high God”
Twitter: https://twitter.com/patton6966
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOcxxWkbqDn6TiFcez9XUPQ

Natural News
– “Natural News covers holistic health, nutritional therapies, consciousness and spirituality, permaculture , organics, animal rights, environmental health, food and superfoods , and performance nutrition.”
Web: https://www.naturalnews.com/

The Patriots’ Soapbox
– “We’re the Patriots’ Soapbox News Network: the first 24-hour news publisher and live broadcast run by & for WE THE PEOPLE.”
Web: https://patriotssoapbox.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
Twitter: https://twitter.com/PatriotsSoapbox

Praying Medic
– “Paramedic ★ Author ★ [Q] Researcher”
Web: https://prayingmedic.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic
Twitter: https://twitter.com/prayingmedic
Podcasts: https://prayingmedic.podbean.com/
Blog: https://prayingmedic.com/blog/

Quodverum
– “QuodVerum is an open discussion forum. Many of us are “refugees” from other social media and loathe equally the paternalistic thought police at Twitter and Facebook and the open lunacy of Gab.”
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGuScoEgB4wYOrg-x2GHSrA
Social media: https://social.quodverum.com/
Web: https://www.quodverum.com/

RedPill78/RedPillNews
– “YouTube Journalist – politics, corruption & more. Shows daily @ 6pm EST LIVE Fri/Sat Night”
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCk0rJN52_9-cLGW-TeZwDGw
Web: https://twitter.com/redpill78

The Rebel Media
– “We follow the facts wherever they may lead — even if that conflicts with the official narrative of the establishment.”
Web: https://www.rebelnews.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGy6uV7yqGWDeUWTZzT3ZEg/featured
Twitter: https://twitter.com/RebelNewsOnline

The Rebel Media – Ezra Levant
– “Rebel commander at Rebel News. We tell the other side of the story.”
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ezralevant

The SGT Report
– “The corporate propaganda antidote”
Web: https://www.sgtreport.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2nQYGjfe9I_tgWpqgJorUg
Twitter: https://twitter.com/SGTreport

Steve Pieczenik
– Dr. Steve Pieczenik is a critically acclaimed author of psycho-political thrillers and the co-creator of the New York Times best-selling “Tom Clancy’s Op-Center” and “Tom Clancy’s Net Force” book series. He is also one of the world’s most experienced international crisis managers and hostage negotiators.”
Web: https://stevepieczenik.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTB0IZ3M3CnB9ocxYhUeMxQ

Tiffany FitzHenry
– “Author of the Amazon #1 Bestselling trilogy The Oldest Soul, speaker, and public personality, Tiffany FitzHenry is a vocal agent for change within our storytelling systems, a prolific writer and independent producer.”
Web: https://tiffanyfitzhenry.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdya3p3lN8LSSpmSO2RpELQ
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Tiff_FitzHenry

Total Eclipse (Andy Giardina)
– “Andrea Giardina Investigative Reporter, Singer/Guitarist/Leader Of Total Eclipse (US Metal Band)”
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4tTzgvR7ft5_oHZRx7vA2A

Tracy Beanz
– “Editor-in-Chief @UncoverDC and Host of the “Dark to Light” podcast – found on all major podcasting platforms!”
Web: https://uncoverdc.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/tracybeanz
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC98Zwfvjq12M1oi99Yqd78w

X22 Report
– “X22 Report is a daily show that will cover issues surrounding the economic collapse.”
Web: x22report.com
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/X22Report/channels
Twitter: https://twitter.com/X22Report

ZeroHedge
– “our mission: to skeptically examine and, where necessary, attack the flaccid institution that financial journalism has become.”
Web: https://www.zerohedge.com/

Deconstructing mind control: The Guardian on #QAnon

Deconstructing mind control: The Guardian on #QAnon

Martin Geddes  Feb 9, 2020

“The man who reads nothing at all
is better educated than the man
who reads nothing but newspapers.”
― Thomas Jefferson

A defining question of our time is the legitimacy of the mass media. It is not disputed that they have sold us many illegal wars, corrupt politicians, and empty scares. The contentious issue is whether we are dealing with endemic poor journalism, driven by an ordinary need for attention and greed for power, or something far more systemic and sinister.

Historically the UK’s Guardian newspaper has been left-leaning, with its origins being a northern working and middle class readership. It is the mouthpiece of the British media aristocracy and public sector governing classes. In recent decades — post New Labour — it has adopted Progressivism (read: neoliberal eco-totalitarianism) as its political doctrine.

As such, its readership closely matches what Jacques Ellul describes in his 1962 classic book Propaganda. The liberal intellectual elite presume they are the most immune to mind control, since they are highly credentialed and regard themselves as clever. In reality, they are the most in need of propaganda, since they are expected to have a socially acceptable opinion on every matter, and are easily emotionally manipulated due to underdeveloped “street smarts”.

I have picked one recent article on QAnon as an exemplar of the kind of unethical pseduo-journalism that is targeted at the British and Australian public. I cannot know if this article is ultimately “black hat” military intelligence working to save its hide, “white hats” planting a time bomb to demolish trust in the mass media, or some other (non-)agenda. You have to research that and decide for yourself.

This is also only a critique of media methods, and I have no comment to make on the underlying story. I just happen to be a subject matter expert on QAnon, and therefore interested in overt media bias, covert criminal control, and corrupt social engineering.

Let’s kick off with the title:

[Australian] Psychiatrist struck off for posting ‘bizarre’ QAnon conspiracy theories

As a photographer, I understand how framing a composition is the figural creative act. There are two core choices: the subject (which remains partially or wholly in the frame), as well as what you crop out (and thus isn’t seen at all in the final product).

The subject here is “professional loses livelihood for unacceptable transgression of accepted beliefs”. The message is clear: one that should instil fear in the reader of emulating this unfortunate deluded person. Fear bypasses rational thinking — we equate social ostracism with death — and is the basis for mind control.

There is no room for ambiguity: the headlining of “bizarre” also tells us precisely what to think of QAnon. The casual reader will not go past the headline, and their view is now set. Whatever “QAnon” is, it is an outlandish set of beliefs that only those with serious loss of attachment to reality might adopt. A mental health professional with “bizzare” beliefs (and hence bizzare behaviours) would indeed be a problem.

The term “conspiracy theory” has an interesting history. Its popularisation is documented as the CIA working to discredit the many people who doubted the official story of the death of John F Kennedy. It is frequently used against those who dissent from the “official” position, and not uncommon for those same people to be later vindicated (e.g. Hillsborough disaster). Its use in journalism should be a “red flag”; indeed, I have even observed professionals in related fields lapsing into its use, forgetting that this is a sign that they themselves are being mind controlled by the mass media.

This headline leaves out any possibility that the subject is free speech, freedom of conscience, or the treatment of those who dissent from “official” narratives. If a detached and objective journalistic position was being taken, then the headline might be “Controversy over psychiatrist struck off for QAnon posts”. This would stay entirely within the facts, and does not manipulate the reader by assuming authority to decide on their behalf.

Now let’s take a look at the subheading…

Sydney doctor who shared alt-right views with patients on his clinic website found mentally unfit to treat people

As I mentioned earlier, I have no comment to make on the underlying case. It is quite possible that this doctor has broken the rules of his profession by mixing “business” with “personal” matters. (It seems an extreme outcome for the circumstances, and unlikely to be an appropriate punishment, but it is plausible.) What is of concern here is how this is presented in the media, and the juxtaposition of “alt-right” with “mentally unfit”.

The term “alt-right” is a form of name-calling, used to signal “like racist Nazis, but we can’t say that aloud for fear of litigation”. Again, it is being used to cudgel the reader into a thought form: dissent from (technofascist dogma) is not tolerated.

In this case, the label is also factually untrue. As I wrote before, academic research says positive sentiment to Q is neither left nor right. A mainstream conservative journalist, Patrick Howley, who is relatively new to Q, makes this observation:

And this too…

Papers like the Guardian have previously used “fringe” as an adjective for QAnon, but two years and hundreds of articles dedicated to a “fringe” phenomenon contradicts their own narrative. So “alt-” is the new “fringe”, and it is misleading at best, and mendacious at worst.

Let’s press on, so to speak… now the lead image and its heading.

Once past the sinister evil green “hacker” hands… no subliminal messages there… we get to read:

Dee Why psychiatrist Russell Everard McGregor posted QAnon conspiracy theories on his practice website claiming Donald Trump would reveal a global Satanist paedophile network.

We have an American President who has now issued multiple executive orders on human trafficking, and explicitly made it a priority of his administration. There is copious evidence of a serious problem with high-level protected paedophiles globally (think Savile, Epstein, Dutroux). Satanic occult symbology is all over music videos, Hollywood movies, and fashion magazines. It seems very hard to justify this image heading as coming from a detached and objective position. Moving on…

A Sydney psychiatrist who posted “bizarre” alt-right conspiracy theories he claimed were the directives of US President Donald Trump to his practice’s official website has been struck off the medical register.

You should be immediately thinking… what kind of actual patient harm has been demonstrated, or genuine malpractice? Why is the subject focus on the professional disbarment, and not on the controversy of Q? Why is this reported as if he’d murdered a patient, and such a striking off was an ordinary procedural matter?

The Dee Why doctor Russell Everard McGregor claimed Trump had taped evidence of a global Satanist paedophile network, that 9/11 was faked, and that the ABC was part of an international deep state network covering up the crimes of the elite.

Are claims of criminality and corruption unethical or unlawful? Is there no history of powerful media being involved in covering up crookedness? It is OK to be against ordinary rape and murder of children, but Satanic ritual abuse is unmentionable? Have false flag attacks got a long history in geopolitics or not?

The positioning here is that once you utter the “Trump” trigger, any kind of non-sequitur is permissible. Orange Man Axiomatically Bad, so objective reporting is superfluous and outdated.

Many of the 300-plus posts from 2018 onwards related to the debunked QAnon conspiracy that suggests Trump is leading a crusade against “deep state” forces who protect satanic paedophile rings.

Let’s take a quick look at the latest Q drops…

If Q is a way of Trump communicating with the public (QAnons), then we can tick off paedophilia… and lots of treason, too. Just there’s that small, tiny, problem with the word “debunked”. What, exactly, has been “debunked”, and by what authority?

The Guardian has put itself here in a position of “keeper of the doctrine”… there is no “reporting” associated with the word “debunked”. They have no need for a source beyond their own assertion. It is compelling evidence that this article is propaganda — the very opposite of holding power to account.

As fellow commentator on this hit piece, Matthew Hayden, writes:

The fundamental claim of the mysterious “Q” dude, dudette — or maybe even team of dudes and dudettes — is that he (I’ll use the singular for brevity) is in Trump’s inner circle.

This is a testable hypothesis. It would seem that the Guardian’s debunkulator needs servicing. For the real story is that the public are rejecting the mass media’s failed narrative for a new one — Q. This story cannot be reported by the mass media! They have competition, and their only way to deal with it is to libel this doctor (I hope he sues!) and slur critical thinkers.

“Fight with your keyboard, knowledge and pen,” McGregor wrote in one post in January 2018. “Follow Q breadcrumbs on 8chan.

“The evil truth will be hard for most to bear. Be brave. Seek loved ones and offer compassion to friends and family.”

As someone who has spent innumerable hours researching the matter — I have some articles in preparation that will churn your stomach — this exhortation strikes me as very reasonable.

Note how in a carefully positioned sidebar we have…

QAnon: latest Trump-linked conspiracy theory gains steam at president’s rallies

Those “conspiracy theory” words subtly align to his statement out of the corner of your eye. It’s also both a fringe (“alt-right”) and mainstream (“right”) phenomenon at the same time. That’ll be quality journalism, then!

Back to the article…

In another post detailed by the NSW civil and administrative tribunal this week, McGregor insisted that the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, had not been hiding in the Ecuadorian embassy in London but was in Switzerland or Washington.

“He is an Australian hero and would make a fine future PM,” McGregor wrote.

It’s possible. Who knows. Would this be grounds to end his career? As an investigative journalist, would you not at this point be wondering if the real story was whether he was being persecuted for beliefs unrelated to his medical practise?

The doctor continues to post blogs to the official website of his Northern Beaches Psychiatrist and Psychologist Family Medical Practice.

The blog was only uncovered after McGregor submitted a detailed complaint to the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency about an alleged affair between his wife and a colleague.

Ah. Oh. Oh dear.

This might just possibly have been relevant to the headline. “Jilted husband experiences second blow from vindictive wife”. Now we get a hint of the real story, which is the Q matter is actually peripheral, and being used as an excuse to punish him for daring to hold the bad behaviour of others to account.

Knowing that most people don’t read past the sub-heading, is withholding this data until here ethical journalism? I think you know the answer.

When a colleague working at the same practice complained that the information had been inappropriately shared with her as well, the NSW Medical Council began to look into McGregor’s wellbeing.

It’s positively Sovietesque, no? Blow the whistle on unprofessional behaviour by a colleague, and have your own mental health called into question. Then the fine upstanding liberals at the Guardian will come to defend the whistleblower. Not!

During a hearing into his mental state, McGregor told the medical council that if they had “any understanding of politics, you would understand that the beliefs that are actually put on the blog are actually the directives from President Trump”.

It’s an opinion. Not much different from a religious belief, many might claim. “This is how I see the world.” If you aren’t willing to defend his right to this belief about the benevolence of Donald Trump, who has conspicuously failed to start the promised WW3 so far, what kind of person are you?

When the council chair called to say his registration had been suspended, he called her a “filthy dirty fucking leftwing slut” and claimed she “knowingly used the power of political correctness to inflict woman to male intimidation and assault against [him]”.

“You think you can do this just because I’m rightwing?” McGregor asked.

As far as the Alinskyite Guardian is concerned, yes. Power is its own objective: accuse others of that which you are guilty, make everything personal, and attack the messenger. By their uncritical presentation of this reported speech, I would suggest that they are slyly endorsing her “reverse victimisation” of Dr McGregor. Everything is to be weaponised, including language and protected speech, to ensure conformity to doctrine.

And we have another sidebar item…

How journalists should not cover an online conspiracy theory

The Guardian might like to take its own advice here.

He later used the blog to label the council a “pedophile protection agency” and “deranged President Trump haters and those who are political sycophants of what the Deep State represents”.

What’s the betting there are corrupt people running this council? This is how the “mutual self-promotion club” works: blackmail and violence ensure nobody will snitch, but you’ll get on very well and be rewarded for playing the game. Key “strongholds” are judicial and regulatory bodies that arbitrate power.

Oddly, the Guardian seems uninterested in exploring this story angle. I am sure they themselves have nothing to hide.

McGregor’s deregistration was granted by NCAT on Wednesday after a hearing in which the doctor’s own assessing psychiatrist testified that McGregor was paranoid.

We now have a political opinion declared as reason to persecute a medical professional and have their livelihood removed. No harm to patients needs to be demonstrated. This is a very dangerous line to cross. But one that the supposedly liberal Guardian jaunts over without hesitation. No comment is sought from any bodies who might be concerned about the treatment of Dr McGregor; case closed.

Dr Murray Wright said McGregor had tried to win him over to the QAnon cause by bringing a 600-page document to the consultation.

So justifying your beliefs with evidence is not acceptable and indeed a violation of the rights of a medical body to pronounce on geopolitical affairs. In this court of professional opinion, you are guilty until proven a member of the established power elite.

“These are extraordinary beliefs for a consultant psychiatrist to publicly associate himself with, particularly on a website associated with his clinical practice,” Wright told NCAT.

That’s an opinion, not a fact. Doxa, not epistme. I personally know many respected professionals who share the same views about Q, just who do not feel able to express them publicly. Why so? They fear persecution and loss of their livelihood, and have rent, mortgages and young to raise.

The tribunal agreed, finding McGregor was exposing his vulnerable patients to harm with the posts and was mentally unfit to continuing treating people. “His perception is not the reality,” NCAT said.

If you think you are “liberal” and feel that such uncritical acceptance of this position is “journalism”, then I weep for you. Should you lose your job for expressing your views as a Scientologist? A vegan? A communist, even? Where’s the boundary of “unacceptable” political or religious opinion at work?

“His clients, some of whom may be prone to paranoid thoughts or beliefs, are likely to read the blog and be influenced by his bizarre and overvalued ideas.”

At this point I’m beginning to wonder if Dr Murray Wright needs a little bit of journalistic investigation himself. Also note how this appeals to an hubristic arrogance: I am in the sole position to define what is real or not in this world; there are not areas of legitimate contention or dispute; and departures from orthodoxy in matters unrelated to clinical practise are unacceptable.

McGregor was also found guilty of professional misconduct and banned from reapplying for a year over the posts and his verbal abuse. He will need to prove he has recovered significantly should he wish to practice again.

Until you reform your thought to be in compliance with Party doctrine, you will no longer be allowed to feed or house your family. We hope that others considering expressing similar views take note of your suffering. We have Freedom of Conscience training courses available run by our academic partners in North Korea.

Have a nice day.

• Crisis support services can be reached 24 hours a day: Lifeline 13 11 14; Suicide Call Back Service 1300 659 467; Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800; MensLine Australia 1300 78 99 78; Beyond Blue 1300 22 4636

One of my saddest discoveries has been that these lines are sometimes run by corrupt people and organisations, to identify whistleblowers and filter out complaints against the powerful. (I have no views on these specific Australian examples.) You may wish to check out the relationship between the Clinton Foundation, sex abuse helplines, and human trafficking; or Childline in the UK and the protection of people like Jimmy Savile.

2020 is going to be a rough year for the self-righteous who have arrogantly declared themselves final arbiters of what is real and respectable. This is especially true of mental health professionals working outside of their professional competence. You can’t say that you didn’t have fair warning of your own hubris.

The purpose of political dissent is to allow for adjustment, since the mainstream is commonly wrong on important matters. The “weak signals” of those saying the mainstream is madness are important to protect and preserve. We cherish dissent because of humility: we all will sometimes be part of a deluded mainstream, and benefit from dissent later as the mainstream adjusts.

By publishing a piece like this — that denigrates dissent — it demonstrates how the Guardian is in the business of “presstitution”. This article is not professional news reporting, for it does not use its neutral ethics and objective language. It instead exhibits the methods and mechanisms of propaganda and mind control.

Such hit pieces — protecting a powerful criminal “paedocracy” — will boomerang on “fake news” providers like the Guardian, and doom them to irrelevance and ignominy. A fitting obituary headline might even be “Newspaper struck down for posting ‘bizarre’ QAnon fake news as journalism”

Why #QAnon is the biggest story in the history of journalism

Why #QAnon is the biggest story in the history of journalism

Martin Geddes Feb 7, 2020

Hillary Clinton couldn’t find anything to pin on Donald Trump. Robert Mueller couldn’t find any dirt that would stick either, despite throwing plenty. Now an impeachment process has failed to name a crime — and resulted in an acquittal. Maybe his accusers have something to hide instead?

Speaking of which, would any of the following things be newsworthy in your opinion?

  • “Many in our [government] worship Satan.” (Q3)
  • MS13 is a gang paid “to kill [Democrat political] opponents”. (Q5)
  • There has been a “hostile takeover [of the US Government] from an evil corrupt network of players (not just Democrats).” (Q6)
  • “Obama ultimately OK’d [HRC’s illegal email server] by using the non [government] email [address] to communicate [with] Clinton. Obama also had an alias along with each of his cabinet members [which is illegal].” (Q7)
  • “…false local/national black leaders are corrupt and paid off to help keep the black [population] poor and in need.” (Q9)
  • The FBI and Military Intelligence “have an open investigation into the Clinton Foundation” related to the Haiti crisis, and the disappearance of children? (Q10)
  • The 2016 election was “suppose to be rigged [for HRC]” and “good people [prevented] the rigging”. (Q14)
  • “Soros, Clintons, Obama, Putin, etc. are all controlled by 3 families” (Q15)
  • “The corruption that will come out is so serious that deals must be cut for people to walk away otherwise 70% of elected politicians would be in jail.” (Q15)
  • We knew in October 2017 that Trump is “100% insulated with zero risk of impeachment (fact).” (Q16)
  • Nancy Pelosi is faking her memory going as protection against prosecution. (Q18)
  • The treasonous “CIA thinks its foreign offshore assets are strong enough to defend against the US executive (not accounting for military use on domestic soil).” (Q23)
  • “Any person making statements they will not be seeking re-election was put in submission. For the betterment of the country not all will be prosecuted and all will do as told.” (Q24)
  • North Korea is “not being run by Kim, he’s an actor in the play.” (Q29)
  • “The child abductions for satanic rituals (ie Haiti and other 3rd world countries) are paused” (Q29)
  • “Would you believe a device was placed somewhere in the [White House by the Obama admin] that could actually cause harm to anyone in the room [subsequently] and would in essence be undetected?” (Q30)
  • There is a “World [political] stalemate. We all have the goods on everyone else. That’s part of the reason why some things that tie back to foreign heads of state will remain classified (not all).” (Q31)
  • The text of a future public announcement that “over the course of the next several days you will undoubtedly realize that we are taking back our great country (the land of the free) from the evil tyrants that wish to do us harm and destroy the last remaining refuge of shining light.” (Q34)
  • Prospectively… “On POTUS’ order, we have initiated certain fail-safes that shall safeguard the public from the primary fallout which is slated to occur 11.3 upon the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta (actionable 11.4).” — with 2020 increasingly looking like dates on which this is executed, after the election. (Q34)
  • Patriots recorded the corrupt “tarmac deal” of Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch, which in turn forced the hand of Comey in the 2016 election. (Q36)
  • “If Trump failed… and HRC assumed control [in 2016], we as Patriots were prepared to do the unthinkable (this was leaked internally and kept the delegate recount scam and BO from declaring fraud).” (Q36)
  • Obama was helping to arm North Korea with nuclear weapons using US miniaturisation technology? (Q39)
  • The US destroyed “…the mountain that housed North Korea’s nuclear weapons” with “critically important materials as well as scientists aka the bomb makers… inside when it happened” and (sarcastically) “no global news agency suspects we had nothing to do with it.” (Q41)
  • The Obama administration made false statements about the Uranium One fissile material and its export from the US. (Q46)
  • North Korea and Iranian nuclear programs were funded via “billions (in cash and wire)” to sent to Iran by the Obama administration. (Q50)

Those are just some highlights from the first fifty Q drops. At the time of writing, the most recent drop is number Q3834. So there’s a LOT more than just this short list of already epic scandals. This includes the stunning claim of a 16 year plan (Barack Obama plus Hillary Clinton) to destroy the American Republic forever. (Q570)

Now ask yourself:

  • Why is the mass media so desperate to paint the Q operation (aka “QAnon”) as a “fringe far-right conspiracy theory”?
  • Why do they refuse to discuss the true source of the Q drops, or ask the President about his relationship to the Q movement?
  • Is it credible that the President of the United States would allow his base and reputation to be tainted by hoaxers, when he could end it with one tweet?

I think you know the answer: the evidence is overwhelming that the QAnon operation is a product of the Trump administration’s military intelligence. The mass media is therefore openly deceiving and gaslighting the public.

There is a massive cover-up of global gangster government by a mafia media industry. How so? Criminals have been in control of journalism for decades via blackmail networks — such as that run by Jeffrey Epstein and his intelligence agency sponsors.

None of the above revelations have been investigated honestly by the mass media. Their scandalous lack of integrity — and impending crisis of legitimacy — is the biggest story in the history of journalism.

QAnon, information osmosis and reality purification

QAnon, information osmosis and reality purification

The Trump administration’s # QAnon program is an “information osmosis filter” that removes “information pollutants” from our “reality model.”

Clean water is wonderful. I must admit I’m quite a fan of carbonated bubbles in mine: I prefer a bottle of sparkling mineral water over wine as a treat for a meal. That said, what I have in mind now as I type this is “Thames Spring” – or, in other words, tap water in London.

Clean information is also “delicious”. The equivalent of “public water supply” is the mass of mainstream media. The problem we face is that it is not “drinkable”. Indeed, the flow of false stories is positively harmful, poisoned with tainted propaganda and poisonous hoaxes.

In the 19th century, the Victorians took pride in clearing London’s water, and today the river is relatively clean. Modern filtration and treatment ensure that my tap water is safe to drink. One of the technologies that can achieve this is (reverse) osmosis.

The principle of osmosis is that a solvent liquid passes through a membrane to equalize the concentration of a substance dissolved therein – without pressure being exerted on it. Reverse osmosis applies pressure to one side to achieve an uneven concentration. A classic use of reverse osmosis is the desalination of sea water.

So, how can one remove the polluting propaganda dissolved in the solvent of mass media? Well, we seem to have an osmotic-like system with QAnon, which is used to perform “purification of reality” for a society that is secretly socially constructed to be divided.

The “pressure” comes from the Q drops, which have received a lot of attention and traction from the public. Prof Joseph Ucsinski, an associate professor of political science at the University of Miami, recently appeared on Watters World on Fox and gave two interesting data points:

From their polls, about 10% of the U.S. population has a positive sentiment regarding QAnon. (And therefore consciousness is necessarily important, and this is not a “fringe phenomenon.”)
Those people are evenly distributed on the left and right. (And therefore, this cannot be an “extreme right” phenomenon.)
This pressure is being exerted on the mass media through the echoes of Trump administration’s Q themes. A remarkably level-headed and informative American Thinker article summarizes it as follows:

In recent weeks, Trump’s focus on Q has accelerated, with the President retweeting 20 followers 20 times in one day. Trump included Q fans in his ads and used one of Q’s signature phrases (“These people are sick”) at his meetings. The president’s lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, also retweeted Q followers.

The Q drops also contain many mentions of Iran, and the strategic background of scandals involving the Obama administration (such as Uranium One), along with the media cover-up. Trump tweeted “The world is watching” about Iran, a very common Qism, especially in the same context. Given the recent events in Iran, if the Q drops are indeed a product of the Trump administration, these drops would be very newsworthy.

We’ve also had Trump:

  • Put an “accidental” extra Q in a tweet.
  • Have a “Q” “accidentally” appear behind him
  • Place yourself “by accident” in a political ad like the tail of a Q.
  • Capitalize “accidentally” Tweet a Q crypto tripcode
  • Have soldiers “accidentally” stand around his helicopter to form a “Q +” (since POTUS is Q +).

… Among hundreds of other “proofs” of a Q-POTUS link.

This “pressure” is intended to overcome the public’s “disbelief” problem. The idea that the mass media has ALL infiltrated and controlled by a global criminal cartel seems ridiculous. Surely someone would tell me if a “rival” publication lied to me? Still, we only need to check out one QAnon article to see how “dirty” the media is.

Take this from the British Guardian newspaper:

  • “Ridiculed ridicule” assumes a position; there is no pretense for an equal-hand investigation.
  • “Prominent conspiracy theory” tells you what to think by calling upon their own authority; this Q thing can’t be true, even if things like the Hillsborough disaster went from “conspiracy theory” to “fact.”
  • “Right-wing hoax” has no substance – where is the evidence that it is “right-wing”; who is the “hoaxer” and how was this proven?
  • “The conspiracy theory is yet to gain traction in the UK” but who says because we are aware of 10% in the US?
  • This fits the pattern described by Jon Rappoport as the mechanism of mass mind control:

In other words, there are only two supposed areas. The first is a neutral certainty [of the “official conviction”]. It almost sounds like science. Then there’s the crazy Loonsville [like “QAnon”], where insane fantasies float around. The right choice is obvious.

Importantly, we can see how this Guardian article lies by omitting, misleading the reader to misrepresent reality in Loonsville. No evidence has been reported of any Q-POTUS connection, with Q being central to press corruption or the refusal of the press to discuss Q with the President. You are told what to feel and think, and you have refused the necessary information to make your own decision.

For fun, you might want to contrast the Guardian article with this video, which highlights how the mass media misinforms the public that “elite pedophilia” is Loonsville, and then contrasts with Epstein’s revelations:

The genius of the QAnon operation is as follows: if the press ignores it, it confirms the “Q hypothesis” that they are “fake news”. When they deal with it, they are forced to report it incorrectly, which shows the accusation of “fake news”. The “polluting” beliefs are gently pulled from society by people who realize the media is lighting and cheating them. They mass media are not independent voices, but hiss with one forked tongue.

This only works because there is a “membrane” in this “information reverse osmosis” system for “reality cleansing”. It is constructed through “holes” of “plausible denial”. Each individual Q-POTUS link can be explained, although some with extremely great effort. People should choose to deal with the evidence and logic rather than being changed in change.

Therefore, the QAnon system is naturally nonviolent and rooted in free will. We are not ‘distilling’ the false beliefs of the public by sending them to re-education camps! There is also no “Trump Daily” high pressure information pump that works unlike the MSM; it is not necessary and would only be seen as another polluted source of propaganda.

Because the media has been so saturated with lies for so long, the reality of many people “tastes” because they are so used to consuming polluted information. Q is the “one way filter” to help them disinfect their understanding of the world and demand “pure” news. The “Q question” is the last piece that brings their polluted beliefs into contact with the cleansing “membrane”.

To summarize, the “Q question” is why the press collectively refuses to ask the President about QAnon and whether his administration is involved. People who now believe that “Orange Man Bad” will always be able to find another talking point from the lies the media has fed them, but cannot find an answer to this simple question in their (polluted and inverse) cosmology.

In the philosophy classic of Plato’s cave, we are asked to distinguish the real external reality from the dancing shadows in the cave. With the current divide in society, we have a debate among friends and family about “who is in the cave and who is outside?”. The “Q question” is the touchstone for this and immediately brings both belief systems into contact with the “membrane”.

This is the minus doubt that exit from the Cult of the Official Media Narrative allows. There are no legions of “ex-QAnon” people; no recovery groups; no “deprogramming” courses. That’s because the ‘Q belief system’ is grounded in a ‘purified’ reality freed from #FakeNew’s propaganda pollutants.

To believe otherwise is to limit yourself to the absurdity of arguing that the president asks why he is promoting a so-called debunked conspiracy theory “… will have the added effect of making the questioner look like a fool.” By reductio ad adsurdam, you know this is not a #WINNING logical proposition: it doesn’t ask the “Q question” that makes you a fool!

The QAnon “information (reverse) osmosis” engine works well to clear the public’s beliefs. More and more people are realizing that they should only swallow non- # FakeNews information sources. The resulting ‘purification of reality’ gradually removes the gap in society between people with ‘polluted’ and ‘clean’ belief systems.

I expect the outcome of QAnon to be delicious (preferably with carbonated bubbles).

An Introduction to Q

By Deborah Franklin (Deborah Franklin is the pen name of a writer who fears professional retribution.)

Who is Q? What is Q? And, perhaps most importantly, why is Q? Q and the ever-growing worldwide movement it’s inspired have been the objects of fascination, mockery and hatred, but of surprisingly little serious analysis.

Q first appeared in October 2017 on an anonymous online forum called 4Chan, posting messages that implied top-clearance knowledge of upcoming events. More than 3,000 messages later, Q has created a disturbing, multi-faceted portrait of a global crime syndicate that operates with impunity. Q’s followers in the QAnon community faithfully analyze every detail of Q’s drops, which are compiled here and here.

Continue reading….

The mainstream media has published hundreds of articles attacking Q as an insane rightwing conspiracy, particularly after President Trump seemed to publicly confirm his connection to it. At a North Carolina rally in 2019, Trump made a point of drawing attention to a baby wearing a onesie with a big Q.

In recent weeks, the tempo of Trump’s spotlighting of Q has accelerated, with the President retweeting Q followers twenty times in one dayTrump has featured Q fans in his ads and deployed one of Q’s signature phrases (“These people are sick”) at his rallies. The President’s lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, has also retweeted Q followers.

Q has noted that the media never asks Trump the obvious question: What do you think of Q? To Q followers, the reason they don’t ask is obvious. They’re afraid of the answer.

In the meantime, Q’s influence continues to spread. Protestors in Hong Kong, Iran, and France have held up Q signs and chanted Q quotes. Q’s revelations are uniting people all over the world who want freedom.

If you’re unfamiliar with Q or only know it through the media’s attacks, I’d like to provide a brief introduction to this extraordinary phenomenon. I’ve followed Q since the first drop, and I’ve grown increasingly impressed by the accuracy, breadth and depth of Q’s messages. Q followers were prepared long in advance for the easing of hostilities with North Korea, the deflation of the mullahs of Iran, and the discovery of Ukraine as a hotbed of corruption for American politicians. They knew a great deal about Jeffrey Epstein’s activities before the public did and anticipate even more shocking revelations to come. As Q likes to say, “Future proves past.” As Q’s predictions come true, they lend retroactive credibility to the entire enterprise.

Q’s followers believe that Q is a military intelligence operation, the first of its kind, whose goal is to provide the public with secret information. Many Q followers think the Q team was founded by Admiral Michael Rogers, the former Director of the National Security Agency and former Commander of US Cyber Command. Some suspect that Dan Scavino, White House Director of Social Media, is part of the team, because the high quality of Q’s writing has the luster of a communications expert.

Q is a new weapon in the game of information warfare, bypassing a hostile media and corrupt government to communicate directly with the public. Think of Q as a companion to Trump’s twitter. Whereas Trump communicates bluntly and directly, Q is cryptic, sly and subtle, offering only clues that beg for context and connection.

Here’s the way it works: Q posts messages (also known as “drops” or “crumbs”) on an anonymous online forum, which are discussed, analyzed, and critiqued by the board’s inhabitants. (The forum has changed a few times after massive online attacks.) Hundreds of social media accounts then spread Q’s latest posting to worldwide followers who share their research, analysis, and interpretations of Q’s latest information.

I’ve compiled a list of Q’s most famous catch phrases and tried to put them into context.

The Great Awakening: We’re living in a unique time in which ordinary citizens around the world are collaborating to understand and expose the corrupt system that rules us. The system thrives on deception, and the overwhelming task of The Great Awakening is to penetrate its lies and reveal the truth.

The first phase of The Great Awakening is heightened awareness of the Deep State – the interlocking governmental entities that operate outside the law to expand their own power. Elections and popular opinion don’t impact the ability of the Deep State to enforce its agenda.

The second phase of The Great Awakening investigates the Deep State’s alliance with other powerful sectors: the media, Hollywood, charities and non-profits, public schools and universities, religious organizations, medical, scientific and financial institutions, and multinational corporations. This phase can be painful, as you discover that “those you trust the most” (in Q’s phrase) are deceiving you. Beloved celebrities, religious leaders, doctors, educators, innovators, and do-gooders are all in on the hoax.

The third phase of The Great Awakening is perhaps the most painful of all. The people who rule us are not merely amoral creatures who view us as collateral damage in their drive for money and power. It’s scarier than that. The potentates we serve are actively trying to harm us. That’s their goal. We’re under coordinated attack.

Dark To Light: Q tells us that what our rulers fear the most is exposure. Bringing their crimes out of protected darkness into the light of public scrutiny destroys their power to deceive. And as their power fades, the darkness of our divided, violent world will yield to the light of freedom, cooperation, and peace.

Where We Go One We Go All (WWG1WGA): Q’s most famous phrase expresses the worldwide egalitarian nature of the movement. Every country is suffering from the system’s oppression, and the whole world will benefit from a rebirth of freedom. In this unique movement, anonymous citizens work in collaboration with the highest-ranking military leaders and the president, and everyone’s contributions are valued. When commenters on the board have thanked Q for his service, Q has replied that no one is above and no one is below. “We work for you.”

These people are sick. Perhaps the most difficult aspect of The Great Awakening is coming to terms with the depravity of our rulers, whom Q has called The Cult. Jeffrey Epstein’s story has helped to awaken people to some of the elite’s crimes. The mysterious temple on Epstein’s island hints at possible future revelations that are frightening in their scope. Q followers believe that The Cult engages in ritual practices that enshrine the shedding of blood and which prey on the innocence of children. The sickness in their souls thrives on brutality, war, and terror. These disclosures will be tough for the public to take.

Trust the plan. The presumed military leaders who created Q and who protected Trump throughout the election and presidency have created a precise path to victory. Despite the seeming chaos of daily events, a steady progression of victories is taking place. The plan includes offensive maneuvers against the Cult’s financial power, legal standing, human supply chains, and military capacity. And, of crucial importance, the plan attacks the Cult’s ability to control the narrative that shapes what the public believes. In this high-stakes game of information warfare, Q plays a vital role by empowering ordinary citizens (like me) to spread the truth.

They want you divided. The hatred that’s growing between races, classes, age groups, religions, and political parties is purposely fomented by the Cult. The more we’re divided and focused on attacking each other, the weaker we become. Q urges us to stay together and to fight the Cult, not each other.

They think you’re sheep. The Cult believes, as Q says, “you’ll follow the stars” – the celebrities in media, Hollywood, and academia who tell you, in coordinated fashion, what you’re supposed to think. Their contempt for you makes them confident they can control you and ensure your surrender to any agenda. Q, on the other hand, offers only clues and can only be understood by high-grade critical thinking, spurred by constant crowd-sourced criticism and reassessment. The essence of the Q movement is to think for yourself.

Bigger than you can imagine. Expand your thinking. Q encourages us to reevaluate everything we think we know. The Cult may date back to ancient times, and through its powerful families, it might have manipulated historical events in ways that we haven’t suspected. The Cult may also possess advanced technology and medical cures that have not been released to the public. One aspect that may be “bigger than you can imagine” is the unfathomable scale of theft from our national coffers, as funds for foreign aid and wars wind up in the Cult’s pockets.

Track resignations. Beneath the surface, a broad and deep cleansing of corrupt players is taking place. Q asked us to track resignations to understand the scope of activity. (Here’s a website that took him up on his request: www.resignation.info) Resignations, retirements, and unexpected deaths from major players in politics, media, charities, and corporations all point to possible deals being made quietly without the public fanfare of arrests. For me, a notable resignation is Eric Schmidt’s abrupt exit from Google, which received little media attention. Schmidt resigned on December 21st, 2017the same day that President Trump signed an executive order declaring a national emergency related to “serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world.” Further context for Schmidt’s resignation may be inferred from this photo of him in North Korea, apparently in an advisory role. Standing next to him is Bill Richardson, former Governor of New Mexico, the state in which Epstein had a secret ranch. Richardson has been accused by one of Epstein’s victims.

Their need for symbols will be their downfall. The Cult uses certain symbols over and over again, which may serve some ritualistic need, but makes them vulnerable to detection. Q followers are familiar with Y-shaped horns that mimic those of the goat deity Baphometowlspyramids, one eye encased within a pyramid, red shoes, bandaged fingers, and other repeating symbols, including the mysterious black eye that afflicts so many famous people. The Q Army also knows the coded pedophile symbols listed by the FBI. When Q drew attention to the design of Epstein’s temple, alert Q followers noticed how similar it is to the set design of a famous talk show. And the red ring on the hand of dead terrorist Qassam Soleimani prompted Q followers to compile images of similar rings on the hands of powerful people. An excellent source for understanding how these symbols are incorporated into pop culture targeting the young through music videos, TV shows and movies can be found at vigilantcitizen.com.

Nothing can stop what is coming. Nothing. Now comes the pain. The headlines on any given day may sound discouraging for those who want justice to prevail. But these setbacks are temporary, as a juggernaut of justice heads our way. As Q likes to say: We have it all. Massive amounts of irrefutable evidence await the criminals who try to evade their reckoning in court. For those who worry about Trump’s ability to overcome impeachment, election fraud, and assassination attempts, Q assures us: Patriots in control. And no legal tricks can help the criminals escape the ultimate judgment of public disgust. Q promises us that the day is coming when they can’t walk down the street.

You are the news now. The “fake news” decried by President Trump is losing credibility and audience by the day. Q has exposed the 4 A.M. drops that provide the daily talking points to media personnel, so they can all parrot the same propaganda. Q has also named various journalists whom he says take bribes. The media is concentrated within six powerful companies; on the other hand, the Q army is vast, voluntary, and anonymous. Q assures us that our efforts to disseminate the truth through social media and conversations with family and friends are having a huge impact. We are the news now.

We know what happens in the end. God wins. Many times, Q has asked us to pray. He’s quoted the famous Biblical lines of Ephesians 6:12, “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” We’re living through monumental times. It’s comforting that Q believes that if we work together, God wins.

Understanding #QAnon as the antidote to authority

Understanding #QAnon as the antidote to authority

by Martin Geddes, December 29, 2019

We are currently immersed in an unconventional war. Everyone I know senses the intense social and political conflict, unlike any we have experienced before in our lives. Clashing narratives divide families, friends and work colleagues. The war does not yet have an accepted name, but it can be seen as a continuation and culmination of many “hot” and “cold” wars over the past century and more.

This war pitches a global Structural Elite (aka the Deep State or The Establishment) against a popular uprising across multiple countries, most notably the USA. A self-sustaining psychopathic culture has covertly ruled over the populace via criminal control of banking, media, government, academia, industry, religion, and the military. It involves mafia-like families, secret societies and extensive hoarding of information.

We are being gradually exposed to some of this dark power system’s mechanisms: blackmail centres like Epstein Island, pay-for-play networks such as with the Clintons and Bidens, sexual slavery with groups like NXIVM, and (if you’ve been paying attention) even baby farms.

Add in human trafficking, imported militias and lots of very powerful paedophiles. It’s stomach churning and treacherous stuff, and much worse is to come.

The most potent of these corrupt social control systems is the corporate mass media. Q is the “antidote” military operation, designed to break their narrative-setting power permanently. I have previously described this Q phenomenon at the highest level with my essay WWG1WGA — The Greatest Communication Event in History, which introduces the catch-22 that Q constructs for the #FakeNews.

I later unpacked this analysis with The 4 Functions of Q. The last of these functions is Q as an “information weapon against institutionalised crime and corrupted media”. Let me expand a little on how I see Q as a weapon on a complex information battlefield. By the end of this article, I hope you will have a clearer “lens” through which to make sense of mainstream coverage of #QAnon.

(A quick aside for the new and confused: the “Q team” produces the information “drops” now on 8kun.net; “QAnons” are ordinary, anonymous people on such social media websites; “#QAnon” is the media-friendly hashtag often used in headlines to represent the movement as a whole.)

What we are being asked to do via Q is to reconsider at a fundamental level what “information” is in the context of world affairs. This involves a paradigm shift from the “authoritative news” model of the corporate media to the “sauced bread” model of social media sites like 4chan and 8kun. Let’s first examine the familiar process of getting our “daily news-fix” via TV, radio and the press.

The corporate media is heavily branded — think BBC, CNN, Reuters — and is run by professional journalists. They seek data from public and insider sources, produce and edit their work in private, and then (for print media) present their insights and opinions under their own byline. Mainstream journalists depend on the distribution power of their publications or programmes to get them an audience.

Central to this distribution model is the authority of the brand. You are invited to believe what you read or hear, even if sources are anonymous and writers unknown to you, because the brand is a trusted authority. So a New York Times opinion piece is seen as having more authority to identical words from the same author published on a personal blog.

Most journalists are reasonably honest and honorable, for sure. But it only takes (blackmail and extortion) control over a few proprietors, editors, and hiring managers to effectively have control over the medium itself. The claim of many of us is that there is an “attack surface” against the mass media — and that it has been extensively exploited by highly sophisticated criminals. As such, the appearance of authority is being used to further corrupt ends and cover for organised crime.

This is where #QAnon comes in as an information weapon. It is an unprecedented challenge to the foundation of public trust and belief in the mass media. The mass media is forced to position #QAnon as a rival “authority” source, and one which is hilariously lacking in brand credibility.

That is because under no circumstances must the corporate media allow the audience to reconsider whether “authority” is a helpful pointer to truth.

The mainstream media (MSM) audience has outsourced their power to think for themselves to external authority — and this authority is gaslighting and exploiting them. If they realise the seriousness of the betrayal, then it is “game over” for the #FakeNews.

Let me say that again, more slowly. The mainstream media positions #QAnon as a thing you “believe in”, or are a “follower of”, like some kind of New Age spiritual cult. Those who “follow Q” are depicted as mindless morons, not critical thinkers. Their data, arguments and insights are accepted and dismissed as a collective, not as free-thinking individuals.

This is because the corporate media’s claim to legitimacy is founded upon you believing they solely have authority to define ‘reality’, so you should (uncritically) believe them.

In particular, when they speak with one voice you presume that there must be an underlying truth, because you do no see the coordination mechanism. They appear to be multiple independent sources, but are in fact controlled by corrupt intelligence agencies. This is the cruel mass mind control trick that is being perpetrated against the public.

From the MSM’s perspective, #QAnon is an unbranded, unprofessional, unsourced set of text and image posts on an exotic and unruly social media site. In their paradigm it has zero authority — so you should not believe any of it. Indeed, it’s so patently absurd that anyone could treat such a thing seriously, you shouldn’t even entertain the idea of going there and looking at the raw data for yourself.

Of course, the reality is they know Q is an existential threat; but to ignore Q raises questions, and they are only left with feeble hit pieces on #QAnon to maintain the illusion of authority.

The “authority” model extends to the big social media platforms, too. They are also in the business of only allowing you to promote the “official narrative” — not challenging it. As this Newstarget article on censorship notes (my emphasis):

Big Tech’s excuse for engaging in this mass censorship agenda is that it is somehow necessary in order to promote “authoritative information.” But as Adams explains, “authoritative information” is simply a fancy misnomer to categorize deep state propaganda.

When you (unconsciously) buy into the current “authority” media model, you will continue to accept whatever lies and propaganda that the mass media pushes your way, and you will reject alternative data like Q because it lacks the authority you (wrongly) believe is a proxy for truth. This is the trap we see many of those dear to us struggling to escape: incredulity stops them seeing the coordinated propaganda reality.

It’s hardly surprising when the MSM won’t help you by showing you how to read Q drops, or pointing you at the most interesting parts. Because… guess what? The information in these “drops” comprises the most explosive political scandals in history, including their own complicity in serious criminality!

“Q followers” have been watching these scandals slowly unfold for the last two years, waiting for the hammer to finally fall on the crowds of crooks. Q drops have often foreshadowed events in a way only a plan with military precision could account for. It looks like the fun is about to really get going with Spygate/FISAgate, with the Clinton Foundation in the spring/summer.

By allowing someone else to tell you what to think you have ceded your own authority. The mainstream news is 6-18 months behind understanding of events of “Q followers”. There’s a real cost to pay of being “out of touch” — yet seemingly having the comfort of the crowd.

The Q drops are constructed to initially appeal to those who are the most skeptical and open minded, and thus have the least utility for “authority” as a short cut to veracity. In other words, the QAnon project has created a nucleus community of critical thinkers, around which the public can assemble to reclaim the authority to decide for themselves.

It’s as if the diseased Official Narrative “hive mind” is having a new “hive” built next to it, and Q is the Queen bee of this cleansed new narrative environment. There’s no precedent in history for this happening that I know of, although there are many “narrative collapses” like the end of the USSR.

Q is core to a new citizen media that usurps the untrustworthy mass media as their brand-authority model collapses. This is not about citizens working as unpaid journalists, replicating the existing corporate media model. We are not offering ourselves as a more authoritative and trustworthy kind of news operation per se. Citizen media happens when citizens accept that the only acceptable authority is themselves.

The model of the “chans” (where Q lives) is a template for how collaborative investigative journalism can be produced. It is a very different paradigm. Collective data “crumbs” with “sauce” (i.e. hard evidence, not opinion) are openly assembled by volunteers into the “bread” and “buns” by “bakers”. Rather than news bulletins there are “notables” summaries capturing the most interesting threads.

Nobody tells you what to think. It’s the opposite for corporate journalism: an open process, stripped of personal and institutional branding. There is no authority tied to individuals or corporate logos.

The data that emerges from that process, as well as parallel endeavours on Twitter and elsewhere, then feeds into a new distribution system: ordinary people have “hijacked” social media for citizen journalism to bypass the controlled mass media. We’re only as authoritative as our personal reputations or (where necessary) pseudonyms.

You don’t have to believe anything I say, but I reckon you’d be dumb to accept the word of a NYT journalist over mine because of their brand. In this paradigm, a New York Times opinion piece arguably has less authority to identical words from the same author published on a personal blog. The very idea of “authority from corporate being” is discredited.

We citizen journalists are such a threat to the established order that these social media platforms are being forced to expose themselves as censorship engines. For example, Twitter won’t let me add any followers right now: their behaviour is obviously fraudulent.

What was set up to be a surveillance and censorship system has been turned back upon its criminal creators (and have no illusions, companies like Twitter, Amazon, Facebook, and Google have a LOT of nasty legal problems ahead).

This is also why the idea of Q as a “Qult” is laughable: the only demand that Q places upon us is to think for ourselves. There are no mandatory doctrines, no membership list. It’s the perfected antithesis of a cult, which demands unquestioning belief in an authority, with coercive penalties for apostasy.

I was going to delve into the detail of the specific mechanisms by which Q deconstructs belief in institutional authority, and replaces it with sovereign person authority. Plausible deniability and information osmosis will have to wait for another day. If you take one thing away from this Sunday evening essay it is this: you cannot simultaneously believe in the authority of media brands to tell you what to think — and also be truly thinking for yourself.

It’s one or the other: make your choice wisely.

(I’m with Q and the critical thinkers.)